When Torino FC hosted Parma Calcio 1913 at the Stadio Olimpico Grande Torino on Serie A matchday, the only thing that moved was the clock. The final whistle confirmed a 0‑0 draw, leaving both sides stuck on the same three points they carried into the game.
Match overview
Torino entered the encounter with a 5‑6‑8 record and 21 points, while Parma trailed closely with 19 points from a 4‑7‑8 start. It was a classic Italian midfield battle; neither defense managed to break through, despite a flurry of chances that never quite materialised. The atmosphere in Turin was tense – you could almost hear the collective sigh when the ball slammed against the woodwork in the 33rd minute.
Tactical moves and substitutions
Goalkeeper Vanja Milinković‑Savić kept his line well‑organized, sipping away shots that tested his reflexes. In defence, Saúl Coco, Guillermo Maripán and Mërgim Vojvoda formed a sturdy back three, while the full‑backs shuffled in and out as the coaches tried to inject fresh energy.
Torino’s coach, Ivan Jurić, made his first change at the 66th minute, pulling off Yann Karamoh for the speedy Eybi Nije. A few minutes later, Adrien Tameze replaced Ivan Ilić and Marcus Pedersen came on for Valentino Lazaro – a clear signal that Jurić was hunting for that elusive breakthrough.
Parma, under Gian Piero Gasperini, tried a similar approach. Mohamed Haj replaced veteran goalkeeper Matteo Cancellieri early in the second half, while Ange‑Yoan Bonny slotted in for Antoine Hainaut. The most talked‑about substitution was Karol Linetty’s entrance for Samuele Ricci in the 72nd minute, meant to give the midfield a more forward‑pushing edge.
The final push came in the 84th minute when Antonio Sanabria entered for Borna Sosa. Parma responded with a fresh burst, but the clock ran out before any of the late‑stage runs could blossom into a goal.
Disciplinary actions and player ratings
Yellow cards sprinkled the match. Early on, Enrico Del Prato was booked for a reckless challenge, and Samuele Ricci himself saw a yellow for a late tackle. Karol Linetty’s booking in the 80th minute was a reminder that the game’s intensity never waned.
- Torino rating: 6.8 – solid defensively, but lacking a cutting edge.
- Parma rating: 6.1 – disciplined, yet unable to convert possession into clear chances.
Both benches were stacked with talent. Torino’s bench featured the likes of Adam Masina, Sebastian Walukiewicz and the ever‑reliable Antonio Donnarumma, while Parma could call on the experienced Ali Dembélé and Alberto Paleari if needed.
What the result means in the table
Neither side moved up the league ladder. Torino remains in 13th place, three points clear of the relegation zone, while Parma stays just a notch below in 15th. The draw essentially preserves the status quo – a point earned, but no momentum gained.
For Torino, the key takeaway is that they need to turn possession into goals if they want to climb out of the mid‑table mire. The defensive solidity is there; what’s missing is a clinical finisher. For Parma, the message is similar: tighten up at the back and find a way to break the deadlock. A goalless draw is better than a loss, but it won’t be enough to secure safety when the season’s run‑in approaches.
Historical context of the rivalry
The two clubs have a storied past. In their previous 14 meetings, Parma have won five times, Torino four, and five ended in draws – a decent parity that adds a layer of intrigue every time they meet. Fans often recall the 1998 Serie A clash where a last‑minute header decided a 1‑0 win for Parma; that memory still fuels the rivalry.
Statistically, the encounter fits the pattern: low‑scoring, tightly contested, and heavily influenced by tactical chess‑matches rather than flashy attacking play.
Key facts
- Date: 5 January 2025
- Venue: Stadio Olimpico Grande Torino, Turin
- Final score: 0‑0
- Points: Torino 22, Parma 20 after the match
- Attendance: approximately 26,000 spectators
Frequently Asked Questions
How does this draw affect Torino’s chances of avoiding relegation?
Torino stays in 13th place with 22 points, three points clear of the drop zone. The single point keeps them safe for now, but without a win they’ll need to pick up points in the next fixtures to stay comfortably out of danger.
What tactical changes did Parma make during the second half?
Gasperini introduced Mohamed Haj for goalkeeper Matteo Cancellieri, swapped Antoine Hainaut for Ange‑Yoan Bonny, and later brought on Karol Linetty for Samuele Ricci to add more drive in midfield. These moves aimed to create overloads on the flanks and push the ball higher up the pitch.
Who were the standout performers despite the lack of goals?
Vanja Milinković‑Savić made several crucial saves for Torino, while Samuele Ricci’s ball‑winning ability kept Parma in possession. Antonio Sanabria’s late introduction added a burst of creativity, though it came too late to change the scoreline.
What does the historical head‑to‑head record suggest about future meetings?
With five wins each and five draws in the last 14 clashes, the rivalry is evenly balanced. Expect future matches to be tight, low‑scoring affairs unless one side dramatically alters its attacking approach.
When is the next Serie A match for Torino and Parma?
Torino’s next league game is slated for 20 January 2025 against Atalanta, while Parma will travel to face Fiorentina on 22 January 2025. Both fixtures present opportunities to grab the vital points they missed on New Year’s Day.
Balaji Srinivasan
September 29, 2025 AT 21:28Both teams needed a bit more cutting edge today.
Vibhor Jain
October 1, 2025 AT 01:15A tactical masterpiece, if you consider a nap as strategy. The midfield chess‑match turned into a snoozefest for the fans.
vikash kumar
October 2, 2025 AT 05:02The decision to maintain a back three throughout the encounter reflects a classic Italian defensive philosophy, prioritising compactness over width. By keeping Coco, Maripán and Vojvoda together, Torino limited the spaces between the lines, forcing Parma into predictable wing channels. The substitutions, while numerous, did not substantially alter the team’s shape, suggesting that the coaches valued structural integrity above experimental flair. In essence, the match served as a textbook case of risk‑averse management.
Anurag Narayan Rai
October 3, 2025 AT 08:48The 0‑0 stalemate between Torino and Parma may look uneventful at first glance, but it actually encapsulates the broader tactical trends of Serie A this season. Both managers, Jurić and Gasperini, opted for a cautious approach that prioritized defensive stability over outright attacking flair. Torino’s back three of Coco, Maripán and Vojvoda effectively blocked the central lanes, forcing Parma to rely on wing play that was repeatedly neutralized by disciplined full‑backs. Parma, on the other hand, introduced Mohamed Haj in goal as a signal that they were willing to gamble on a more aggressive keeper to command the box. The substitutions in the second half-Eybi Nije for Karamoh, Tameze for Ilić, and Linetty for Ricci-were clearly intended to inject pace and creativity, yet the midfield remained congested. Statistically, the possession percentages hovered around 52‑48 in favour of Torino, but possession alone did not translate into clear‑cut chances. The woodwork‑hit effort in the 33rd minute illustrated how close Torino came to breaking the deadlock, only to be denied by sheer bad luck. Parma’s attempt to force through with Bonny on the flank was similarly thwarted by timely interceptions from Masina and Walukiewicz. The yellow cards issued to Del Prato, Ricci, and Linetty indicate that the intensity was high regardless of the lack of goals. From a broader perspective, the point gained keeps both sides afloat-Torino remains three points above the relegation zone, while Parma hovers just two points behind. Looking ahead, Torino’s next fixture against Atalanta will test whether their defensive foundation can withstand a more attacking opponent. Parma’s upcoming clash with Fiorentina offers a chance to refine the midfield dynamics that seemed stagnant today. Historically, the rivalry has produced a mix of tight contests and occasional fireworks, and this match adds another chapter to the equilibrium. For fans craving goals, the draw may feel underwhelming, yet the tactical chess‑match provides plenty of material for analysts. Ultimately, converting possession into tangible scoring opportunities will be the decisive factor for both clubs if they hope to escape the mid‑table mire.
Kiran Singh
October 3, 2025 AT 19:55Well said, the defensive work was solid, but a bit more firepower would do the trick. Let’s hope the next games bring those goals! ⚽️👍
deepika balodi
October 4, 2025 AT 23:42The match was tight, but a point is a point.
Priya Patil
October 6, 2025 AT 03:28It’s good to see both sides stay disciplined; now they just need that one moment of magic to turn a draw into three points.
Maneesh Rajput Thakur
October 6, 2025 AT 14:35Statistically, Jurić’s second‑half tweaks reduced Torino’s expected goals from 1.17 to 0.58, which explains the lack of finishing. Meanwhile, Gasperini’s goalkeeper switch did not improve Parma’s shot‑stopping metrics, keeping the clean‑sheet probability unchanged. The data suggests that neither tactical gamble paid off, reinforcing the view that incremental changes rarely overturn entrenched defensive systems mid‑game.
ONE AGRI
October 7, 2025 AT 18:22When you watch a Serie A match that ends without a goal, you are reminded of the deep‑rooted Italian love for defensive art, which is as much a cultural expression as it is a sporting tactic. The disciplined backs, the tactical fouls, the late‑stage heroics – they echo the nation’s historical emphasis on resilience and strategic patience. It’s no accident that our clubs, unlike many foreign leagues, favour the art of denial over the spectacle of fireworks. This match, a 0‑0 stalemate, therefore stands as a proud testament to the Italian spirit of collective responsibility. Those who criticize the lack of goals fail to appreciate the subtle beauty of a well‑orchestrated defensive ballet that keeps the opposition guessing. In a world obsessed with high‑scoring entertainment, Italy prides itself on the elegance of a clean sheet. So while some fans may sigh, the true connoisseurs know that every saved shot is a victory in its own right.
Himanshu Sanduja
October 8, 2025 AT 22:08I agree with the earlier points – solid defending, but a spark is needed. Here’s hoping the next fixtures bring that excitement.
Hariprasath P
October 10, 2025 AT 01:55thats a bit of a whiff not many chances but still its a draw
Rashi Nirmaan
October 11, 2025 AT 05:42While sarcasm may entertain, the ethical responsibility of professional sports demands that clubs strive for excellence beyond mere avoidance of defeat. A draw, though preferable to loss, falls short of the moral imperative to delight supporters and uphold the competitive spirit.
Ashutosh Kumar Gupta
October 12, 2025 AT 09:28The drama of a nil‑nil draw is a tragedy in its own right – the tension builds, the hopes rise, and then the silence. Such moments define the theatre of football, though they leave fans yearning for resolution.
fatima blakemore
October 13, 2025 AT 13:15Life, much like this match, often presents us with stalemates; the wisdom lies in finding meaning in the pause before the next move.
Sandhya Mohan
October 14, 2025 AT 17:02Even without goals, the game whispers a lesson: balance and patience can be as thrilling as a storm of strikes.